Not all triple net investments are interchangeable. That is one of the most important things I find myself repeating to investors who are evaluating a NNN transition for the first time. Each asset type carries different lease structure, different real estate risk, and different exit dynamics — and most investors do not have a consistent way to compare them side by side.
What follows is the framework I use. It applies across every deal type, every tenant category, and every market. The tool does not change. The answers do.
Before comparing asset types, run every property through the same five questions. These are not asset-specific. They are the baseline every deal has to clear before anything else matters.
How much lease term is left — and what are the renewal options?
How durable is this tenant’s business at this specific location?
What is your plan B if the tenant leaves?
What is your exit strategy — and who is your buyer when you sell?
Does the cap rate reflect the actual risk?
That last question is the one most investors skip. A high cap rate on a NNN deal is almost never a discount. It is the market pricing something in — short remaining term, a thinner market, a specialized use, or a limited buyer pool. The screen forces you to find out what before you go further.
Discount Retail (e.g., Dollar General)
Investors are drawn to the simplicity: a recognizable brand, everyday-needs traffic, and a format that is easy to understand. The appeal is real. But lease term is the critical variable in this category, and it is the one most buyers underweight.
As remaining term shortens, cap rates rise — and the market is pricing in uncertainty. If you buy mid-lease and hold too long, you may find yourself selling into an expiration event, which narrows your buyer pool and compresses your pricing at exactly the wrong time.
The screening question to run first: if I hold this three to five years, how much lease term is left when I sell? Then ask what the real estate does if the tenant vacates. Retail boxes left behind in thinner markets can be difficult to re-tenant. Plan B depends heavily on location, and location is worth scrutinizing before you fall in love with the brand.
Specialty Retail (e.g., Sherwin-Williams)
Smaller footprints on strong retail corridors can be sticky assets. Contractors and consumers value convenience, and the store format tends to be adaptable. But lease terms in this category sometimes run shorter than big-box retail, which means you need to understand both the remaining term and the site fundamentals before drawing conclusions.
The right screen here starts with lease options, not the tenant name. Then evaluate the corridor: would other tenants want this location if the current one left? A strong plan B — meaning a site that other users would compete for — reduces your downside risk significantly and strengthens your position with a future buyer’s lender.
Medical and Dental (e.g., Aspen Dental)
Medical use can feel durable. People need care in every market, and specialized buildouts often make tenants more committed to staying through lease expiration. High-traffic nodes with co-located services strengthen the case further.
But tenant quality requires more scrutiny here than in retail categories. The question that matters most is who is actually on the lease. Is it a corporate guarantee, a franchisee obligation, or no guarantee at all? That distinction changes the risk profile of the asset substantially. A dental buildout is specialized — re-tenanting is possible, but plan for time and improvement costs if it comes to that.
Screen it by establishing the guarantee structure first, then ask what the space becomes if it is no longer a dental use. If it sits in a strong retail node with multiple potential users, that answer gets much easier.
Convenience Retail (e.g., 7-Eleven)
When the site is right, convenience retail can be among the strongest real estate in the NNN category. Hard corners — signalized intersections with easy ingress and egress — generate consistent traffic and tend to hold value across market cycles. Location is often everything here, more so than in other categories.
But this category introduces complexity that others do not. Fuel versus no-fuel configurations, varying lease structures, rent bump terms, and — most importantly — environmental considerations tied to underground tanks and fuel sites. These are not disqualifying, but they require specific due diligence before you proceed.
The screen starts with the site: access, corner influence, and traffic count. Then review lease term and options. If there are fuel components, request any available environmental reporting before going further. Environmental unknowns are the one variable in this category that can fundamentally change the deal.
Automotive Services (e.g., Take Five Oil Change)
Service-based automotive uses carry a degree of resilience that other retail categories do not. People keep cars longer in economic downturns, which supports consistent demand even when consumer spending tightens. Real estate tends to be on visible corridors with good access, and the plan B story is often better than expected — other automotive and service tenants frequently want the same type of site.
The risk lives in brand and operator quality. Many of these concepts are relatively newer in some markets, which means store-level operating history may be limited. Underwriting a tenant whose long-term viability at a specific location is not yet established requires more conservatism than a category with a 30-year performance record.
Screen it by evaluating lease term and renewal options first, then corridor quality. The practical test: if this tenant left, which other service users would want this location, and how quickly?
Once you have run the five-question screen on any deal, compare it across three buckets. This is where the framework becomes a tool you can actually use to rank deals against each other rather than evaluate them in isolation.
Lease and Timeline: How much term are you buying, and what happens at expiration? Score from one to five. A 12-year lease with two five-year options scores a five. A four-year lease with no options scores a two.
Real Estate Quality and Plan B: If the tenant leaves, is the site flexible enough to attract another user quickly? A hard-corner location in a primary market scores high. A specialized use in a thin market scores low.
Exit Liquidity: Who buys this asset type, and how deep is the buyer pool when your hold period ends? This is the question most investors skip and the one that determines whether you control your exit or the market does.
Score each bucket from one to five. You do not need perfection in every category — you need consistency and honesty. A deal that scores well across all three is a deal where you understand what you own. A deal with a five on yield and a two on everything else is a deal where you are being compensated for risk you may not have fully evaluated.
Many investors move into triple net to exit the operational complexity of other asset types — aging systems, tenant turnover, ongoing repairs. That benefit is real. But the shift trades one kind of exposure for another.
In triple net, risk lives in the lease and the asset, not in day-to-day operations. Lenders evaluate it the same way. Shorter lease terms, specialized uses, and thinner markets lead to reduced loan proceeds, more conservative underwriting, and refinance pressure at disposition. Your asset type shapes your financing flexibility at every stage — acquisition, hold, and sale.
This is why the three-bucket framework matters. Lease term relative to hold period. Strength of plan B. Depth of the buyer pool. Those three factors show up whether you are buying, refinancing, or selling. Evaluating them at the front end is what keeps you in control of the outcome at the back end.
Higher cap rates in triple net almost always mean you are taking something on — a shorter lease, a thinner market, a more specialized use, or a more limited buyer pool at exit. That is not a reason to avoid higher-yield deals. It is a reason to know exactly what you are choosing and why.
The goal is not to eliminate risk. It is to choose the risk that fits your timeline, your plan B, and your exit. In triple net, your outcome is largely decided before you sign. The framework is what makes that decision intentional rather than accidental.
If you are evaluating a triple net transition as part of a 1031 exchange or a strategic move out of multifamily, I’m glad to walk through the underwriting with you. Request your Eugene–Springfield Apartment Market Snapshot or your University of Oregon Area Apartment Market Snapshot to see what your current asset is worth and what the transition options actually look like from where you stand.
— René Nelson, CCIM
Principal Broker & Owner, Pacwest Commercial Real Estate
René Nelson, CCIM, is the Principal Broker and Owner of Pacwest Commercial Real Estate, a boutique brokerage in Eugene, Oregon specializing in multifamily and investment property. Licensed since 1989 and CCIM-designated since 2008 — a credential held by fewer than 10% of commercial brokers nationwide — she has guided private and institutional clients through complex 1031 exchanges and strategic exits across the Eugene–Springfield and University of Oregon markets for more than three decades. A multiple-time CCIM Transaction of the Year recipient (2013, 2015, 2020, 2021) and winner of the 2024 Best Overall Transaction of the Year, René is known for turning complex transactions into confident, profitable outcomes — helping owners move from hands-on management to hands-free income while protecting the equity and legacy they’ve spent a lifetime building. The resources shared here are for informational purposes only and are not financial, tax, or legal advice. Every property and owner’s situation is unique. For guidance tailored to your goals, connect with me directly and we’ll walk through your options together.
René Nelson, CCIM, on the philosophy behind Pacwest Commercial Real Estate — how she helps Eugene multifamily owners sell, exchange, and build lasting legacy.
© 2026 Pacwest Commercial Real Estate, Inc.
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy